The R. Kelly trial has started, and his defense team is already calling for a dismissal. According to the defense, Kelly has a distinct lima-bean shaped mole on his lower back. Apparently, the man in the infamous sex tape that the prosecution has presented does not have this mole. Therefor, the defense is claiming that the man in the video is clearly not Kelly, and the trial should be dismissed right away. Hmmmmm. I'm just wondering-- if this was the case all along, why did the defense drag this trial date out for 6 years? Why couldn't they just say this in 2002 and have the whole charade end? I know why. Because as my girl Fresh says, "something in the milk ain't clean"! For real!
May 21, 2008
A Unique Body Part Might Save His Ass...Literally!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Maybe the "mole" wasn't on his back 6 years ago. I have freckles and moles on my body that I didn't have 2 years ago. Lame defense! Just like O.J.'s glove.
ReplyDelete